Preview

LITHOSPHERE (Russia)

Advanced search

Comparative Mineralogical and Geochemical Characteristics and Ore Potential of the Ikchuka and Dukaly Mafic–Ultramafic Massifs (Khabarovsk Krai)

https://doi.org/10.24930/2500-302X-2026-26-3-745-780

EDN: DKWBVX

Abstract

   Research subject. The mafic–ultramafic massifs of Ikchuka (~16 km2) and Dukaly (~30 km2) located in the Central Sikhote-Alin (Khabarovsk Krai) formed under accretion–collision tectonic conditions.

   Aim. To compare the mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the massifs, determine their formational affiliation, and identify factors controlling the formation of different types of ore mineralization.

   Materials and methods. Over 4600 lithogeochemical samples were analyzed (ICP–MS/AES after four-acid digestion). Microscopy, X-ray diffraction, FTIR spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy with EDS were carried out. Nonparametric statistical tests (Mann–Whitney), discriminant and factor analyses (Statistica), and geothermobarometry based on antigorite composition were applied.

   Results. The ultramafic part of the Ikchuka massif represents a tectonic slab of mantle restite exhumed to the surface during accretion–collision events. In contrast, the Dukaly massif formed as a product of magmatic differentiation, where local hybridization of ultramafic and gabbroic melts in contact zones triggered sulfide liquid immiscibility and primary PGE concentration. Epigenetic Ni–Bi–Pb mineralization (parkerite, maucherite, cobaltite) against the background of Cu–Fe sulfides dominates in Ikchuka, whereas Dukaly hosts low-sulfide PGE assemblages (cabriite, irarsite, tomamaeite, potarite, tatianaite, stannopalladinite, sperrylite). In PGE-enriched zones of the Dukaly massif, Cr/Ni = 4.16–5.0 and Pt/Pd = 1.94–2.25, indicating hybridization between ultramafic and gabbroic melts in contact zones. The formation of PGE-bearing assemblages occurred via a two-stage process: (1) extraction of platinum-group elements from a highly evolved basaltic melt at
T ~ 1000–1200°C and P = 3–20 kbar; and (2) their redeposition during a pneumatolytic–hydrothermal stage as temperatures decreased from 480–650 °C to ~250 °C. The critical involvement of Cl-bearing fluids (Cl-apatite, phlogopite, chlorite) is demonstrated.

   Conclusions. The massifs represent two geochemically distinct systems. The Dukaly massif exhibits the highest ore potential, as its low-sulfide PGE mineralization is genetically linked to contact plagioperidotites and followed by pneumatolytic–hydrothermal reworking.

About the Authors

B. B. Levochskii
Khabarovsk branch of Polymetal UK JSC; Yu.A. Kosygin Institute of Tectonics and Geophysics, FEB RAS
Russian Federation

Boris B. Levochskii

680000; 18 Muravyov-Amursky st.; 65 Kim-Yu-Chen st.; Khabarovsk



T. Yu. Yakich
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Tamara Yu. Yakich

634050; 30 Lenin av.; Tomsk



T. V. Timkin
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Timofey V. Timkin

634050; 30 Lenin av.; Tomsk



D. V. Levochskaia
Khabarovsk branch of Polymetal UK JSC
Russian Federation

Darya V. Levochskaia

680000; 18 Muravyov-Amursky st.; Khabarovsk



D. S. Tolkacheva
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Darya S. Tolkacheva

634050; 30 Lenin av.; Tomsk



References

1. Arai S. (1994) Characterization of spinel peridotites by olivine–spinel compositional relationships : Review and interpretation. Chem. Geol., 113(3–4), 191-204. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)90066-3

2. Ballhaus C., Sylvester P. (2000) Noble metal enrichment processes in the Merensky Reef, Bushveld Complex. J. Petrol., 41(4), 545-561. doi: 10.1093/petrology/41.4.545

3. Baranchikov A.P., Deriglazov Yu.M. (1960) Report on the results of prospecting works carried out by the Khungariya Party for asbestos in the Komsomolsky District of Khabarovsk Territory in 1958. DVGU Complex Expedition for Building Materials and Non-metallic Raw Materials, Khabarovsk, FB “TFGI for DFO”, No. 8383. (In Russ.)

4. Baranchik A.M., Poleshchuk A.T. (1961) Report on the results of the 1960 party works on the verification of applications. DVGU Prospecting and Exploration Expedition, Khabarovsk, FB “TFGI for DFO”, No. 8774. (In Russ.)

5. Barnes S.J., Cruden A.R., Arndt N., Saumur B.M. (2016) The mineral system approach applied to magmatic Ni–Cu–PGE sulphide deposits. Ore Geol. Rev., 76, 296-316. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.06.012

6. Barnes S.J., Godel B.M., Sluzhenikin S.F. (2022) Quantitative assessment of the relative roles of sulfide liquid collection, magmatic degassing and fluid-mediated concentration of PGE in low-sulfide ores of the No-rilsk intrusions. Ore Geol. Rev., 148, 105042. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.105042

7. Barnes S., Lightfoot P. (2005) Formation of Magmatic Nickel Sulfide Deposits and Processes Affecting Their Copper and Platinum Group Element Contents. (Eds J. Hedenquist et al.). Econ. Geol. 100<sup>th</sup> Annivers. Vol., 179-213. doi: 10.5382/AV100.08

8. Borovikov V.A. (2003) STATISTICA. The Art of Computer Data Analysis: For Professionals. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 688 p. (In Russ.)

9. Chayka I.F., Kamenetsky V.S., Zhitova L.M., Izokh A.E., Tolstykh N.D., Abersteiner A., Lobastov B.M., Yakich T.Y. (2020) Hybrid nature of the Platinum Group Element chromite-rich rocks of the Norilsk 1 Intrusion: Genetic constraints from Cr spinel and spinel-hosted multiphase inclusions. Econ. Geol., 115(6), 1321-1342. doi: 10.5382/econgeo.4745

10. Chetyrkin D.N. (1953) Results of geophysical surveys in the Komsomolsky and Nanaysky districts of Khabarovsk Territory on the Anyuisky, Malmyzhsky and Dukalin areas. Glavgeofizika. Far Eastern Geophysical Trust, Khabarovsk, FB “TFGI for DFO”, No. 4364. (In Russ.)

11. Davydova V.O., Shcherbakov V.D., Plechov P.Yu., Yapaskurt V.O., Shcherbakov Yu.D., Perepelov A.B., Brianskii N.V., Antipin V.S. (2026) Diffusive copper redistribution from shallow degassed magmas to mafic enclaves. Insight from anomalously Cu-enriched enclaves from Bezymianny volcano, Kamchatka. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 473, 108588. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2026.108588

12. Evans B.W., Frost B.R. (1975). Chrome-spinel in progressive metamorphism – a preliminary analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 39, 959-972. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(75)90041-1

13. Golozubov V.V. (2006) Tectonics of Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous complexes of the northwestern Pacific margin. Vladivostok, Dal’nauka Publ., 239 p. (In Russ.)

14. González-Jiménez J.M., Griffin W.L., Gervilla F., Proenza J.A., O’Reilly S.Y., Pearson N.J. (2014) Chromitites in ophiolites: How, where, when, why? A review and new ideas on the origin and significance of platinum-group minerals. Lithos, 189, 127-139. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.06.016

15. Irvine T.N. (1965) Chromian spinel as a petrogenetic indicator. Pt 1. Theory. Canad. J. Earth Sci., 2(6), 648-672. doi: 10.1139/e65-046

16. Izokh E.P., Russ V.V., Kunaev I.V., Natovskaya G.I. (1967) Intrusive series of Northern Sikhote-Alin and Lower Priamurye, ore-bearing and origin. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 382 p. (In Russ.)

17. Kadesh V.T., Poleshchuk A.T. (1962) Report on the results of the 1961 party works on the verification of applications. DVGU Prospecting and Exploration Expedition, Khabarovsk, FB “TFGI for DFO”, No. 9278. (In Russ.)

18. Kamenetsky V.S., Crawford A.J., Meffre S. (2001) Factors controlling chemistry of magmatic spinel: an empirical study of associated olivine, Cr-spinel and melt inclusions from primitive rocks. J. Petrol., 42, 665-671. doi: 10.1093/petrology/42.4.655

19. Khanchuk A.I., Kemkin I.V., Kruk N.N. (2016) The Sikhote-Alin orogenic belt, Russian South East: Terranes and the formation of continental lithosphere based on geological and isotopic data. J. Asian Earth Sci., 120, 117-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.10.023

20. Khromtsov M.V. (1965) Report on the results of prospecting works for asbestos conducted in the middle reaches of the Khungari River in the Komsomolsky District of Khabarovsk Territory in 1964 (Khungariya Party). DVGU Prospecting and Exploration Expedition, Khabarovsk, FB “TFGI for DFO”, No. 10975. (In Russ.)

21. Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Kirillov V.E. (2025a) Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of rocks hosting low-sulfide Pt–Pd–Cu–Ni mineralization in the Dukaly mafic–ultramafic massif (Khabarovsk Territory). Ultramafic–Mafic Complexes: Geology, Petrology, Ore Potential. Materials of the IX All-Russian Conf. with Int. Particip. Ekaterinburg, IGG UrO RAN Publ., 105-106. (In Russ.)

22. Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Kirillov V.E. (2025b) Composition of accessory chromian spinels and rare Ni minerals in mafic–ultramafic rocks of the Ikchuka Massif (Khabarovsk Territory). Metallogeny of Ancient and Modern Oceans – 2025. From Ore Genesis hypotheses to Prediction Criteria. Miass, v. 31, 209-213. (In Russ.)

23. Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Kirillov V.E. (2025d) Formational affiliation and potential ore-bearing of maficultramafic massifs of the Central Sikhote-Alin: the case of Ikchuka and Dukaly massifs (Khabarovsk Territory). Geology and Metallogeny of Non-ferrous and Noble Metals. Proc. of the All-Russian Sci. and Pract. Conf. Ulan-Ude, GIN SO RAN Publ., 42-43. (In Russ.)

24. Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Kirillov V.E., Levochskaya D.V. (2024a) Nature of rare mineralization in dunites of the Bogbasin mafic–ultramafic massif (Khabarovsk Territory). Scientific and Methodological Foundations for the Prediction, Exploration and Evaluation of Diamond, Noble and Non-ferrous Metal Deposits. Materials of the XIII Int. Sci. and Pract. Conf. TsNIGRI, 220-225. (In Russ.)

25. Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Levochskaya D.V. (2024b) The role of fluids in the redistribution and accumulation of platinum-group metals and their alloys in the Dukaly mafic–ultramafic massif (Khabarovsk Territory). Metallogeny of Ancient and Modern Oceans – 2024. Ore Genesis. Materials of the Thirtieth Young Scientists’ School named after Prof. V.V. Zaykov. Miass, South Ural Branch of RAS, 191-195. (In Russ.)

26. Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Levochskaya D.V. (2025c) Composition of accessory chromian spinels and rare Ni minerals in mafic–ultramafic rocks of the Ikchuka Massif (Khabarovsk Territory). Metallogeny of Ancient and Modern Oceans – 2025. Ore Genesis. Materials of the Thirty-First Young Scientists’ School named after Prof. V.V. Zaykov. Miass, South Ural Branch of RAS, 209-213. (In Russ.)

27. Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Levochskaya D.V., Shaldybin M.V., Bestem’yanova K.V., Kirillov V.E. (2026) Low-sulfide PGE mineralization type in the Dukaly mafic-ultramafic massif (Khabarovsk territory): minerals associated with PGE and their petrogenetic significance Izv. Tomsk. Politekhnich. Universiteta. Inginiring Georesursov, 337(2), 251-265. doi: 10.18799/24131830/2026/2/5394 (In Russ.)

28. Levochskii B.B., Yaroslavtsev D.A., Yakich T.Yu. (2025e) Traces of granitoid-derived elements in ore mineralization of ultramafic–mafic massifs of the Sikhote-Alin (Khabarovsk Territory): sources and possible formation mechanisms. Problems of Geology and Subsoil Development. Proc. of the XXIX Int. Young Sci. Sympos. named after Acad. M.A. Usov. Tomsk, TPU Publ., v. 1, 66-67. (In Russ.)

29. Lesnov F.P. (1986) Petrochemistry of polygenetic mafic–ultramafic plutons of fold belts. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 136 p. (In Russ.)

30. Naldrett A.J. (1999) World-class Ni–Cu–PGE deposits: Key factors in their genesis. Mineral. Depos., 34, 227-240. doi: 10.1007/s001260050200

31. Naldrett A.J. (2013) Magmatic sulfide deposits: Geology, geochemistry and exploration. Berlin, Springer, 727 p.

32. Padrón-Navarta J.A., López Sánchez-Vizcaíno V., Hermann J., Connolly J.A.D., Garrido C.J., Gómez-Pugnaire M.T., Marchesi C. (2013) Tschermak’s substitution in antigorite and consequences for phase relations and water liberation in high-grade serpentinites. Lithos, 178, 186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.02.001

33. Petrov O.V., Kiselev E.A., Shpikerman V.I., Zmievskii Yu.P. (2019) Anticipating the distribution of gold-copper-porphyry-type deposits in volcanic-plutonic belts of Russia’s eastern regions based on results of compiling sheets of the State Geological Map-1000/3. Region. Geologiya i Metallogeniya, (80), 50-74. (In Russ.)

34. Rasskazov S.Yu., Konyushenko G.F. (2017) Report on the results of works on the object “Conducting regional geological surveying at a scale of 1:200 000 in 2017 on a group of sheets within the Far Eastern Federal District (excluding the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia))”. Creation of geochemical bases for the sheets of the State Geological Map-200/2 M-52-VI, XI, M-54-XIII (Pravoberezhnaya area) (Stage 3). No. RGF 27486. (In Russ.)

35. Reimann C., Filzmoser P., Garrett R. (2002) Factor analysis applied to regional geochemical data: Problems and possibilities. Appl. Geochem., 17(3), 185-206. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00066-X

36. Smith W., Maier W., Barnes S., Moorhead G., Reid D., Karykowski B. (2021) Element mapping the Merensky Reef of the Bushveld Complex. Geosci. Front., 12(3), 101101. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.001

37. Sukhov V.I. (1994) Problems of magmatic geology of Northern Sikhote-Alin (Report under contract No. 507/521 “Petrographic–petrological and metallogenic bases for the Pribruzhnaya, Eastern and North-Sikhote-Alin series of sheets of the Geological Map-50” for 1990–1994). FB “TFGI for DFO”, No. 22122. (In Russ.)

38. Tredoux M., Lindsay N.M., Davies G., McDonald I. (1995) The fractionation of platinum-group elements in magmatic systems, with the suggestion of a novel causal mechanism. South Afr. J. Geol., 98(2), 157-167.

39. Vas’kin A.F., Roganov G.V. (2007) Mineralogical zoning map of Khabarovsk Territory and Jewish Autonomous Oblast. Scale 1:1 000 000. FB “TFGI for DFO”, No. RGF 25714. (In Russ.)

40. Voroshilov V.G. (2011) Geochemical methods for mineral exploration. Tomsk, TPU Publ., 104 p. (In Russ.)

41. Yakich T.Yu., Zhimuleva E.S., Rudmin M.A., Ruban A.S., Maximov P.N., Shaldybin M.V. (2023) The first identification of cronstedtite in Cu–Ni–PGE ores of the Talnakh intrusion. Sci. Rep., 13, 22437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49953-x

42. Yurchenko Yu.Yu., Dobkin S.N. (2020) Report on the results of works on the object “Conducting regional geological surveying at a scale of 1:200 000 in 2017–2019 on a group of sheets within the Far Eastern Federal District (southern regions). GDP-200 (Stages 2–3) of sheet M-54-XIII (Gurskaya area)”. No. RGF 27809. (In Russ.)

43. Zhao P., Jahn B., Xu B. (2017) Elemental and Sr–Nd isotopic geochemistry of Cretaceous to Early Paleogene granites and volcanic rocks in the Sikhote-Alin Orogenic Belt (Russian Far East): implications for the regional tectonic evolution. J. Asian Earth Sci., 146, 383-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.06.017

44. Ziaii M., Safari S., Timkin T., Voroshilov V., Yakich T. (2019) Identification of geochemical anomalies of the porphyry–Cu deposits using concentration gradient modelling: A case study, Jebal-Barez area, Iran. J. Geochem. Explor., 199, 16-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.01.004

45. Zimin S.S. (1973) Ophiolite parageneses and the upper mantle. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 250 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Levochskii B.B., Yakich T.Yu., Timkin T.V., Levochskaia D.V., Tolkacheva D.S. Comparative Mineralogical and Geochemical Characteristics and Ore Potential of the Ikchuka and Dukaly Mafic–Ultramafic Massifs (Khabarovsk Krai). Special Issue of the Lithosphere Journal based on the materials reported at the IX All-Russian Conference with international participation “Mafic-ultramafic complexes: geology, petrology, ore potential”. 2026;26(3):745-780. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24930/2500-302X-2026-26-3-745-780. EDN: DKWBVX

Views: 271

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1681-9004 (Print)
ISSN 2500-302X (Online)
X