Mineralogy of copper slags of Ekaterinburg Metallurgical Plant

Research subject. Copper slags of Ekaterinburg Metallurgical Plant, founded in 1723 and discontinued in 1808.

Materials and methods. Copper slags were collected from an archaeological excavation site in the Historical Square of Ekaterin- burg. The material composition of the slags was studied in the Laboratory of Physical and Chemical Research Methods of the Institute of Geology and Geochemistry of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Ekaterinburg). The chemical composition of minerals and their photographs were taken using a TESCAN MIRA LMS, S6123 scanning electron microscope with an INCA Energy 450 X-Max 80 energy-dispersive attachment from Oxford Instruments. X-ray phase analysis of the slag was performed on an XRD-7000 X-ray diffractometer from Shimadzu.

Results. The studies showed that copper slags are represented by different types – pyroxene, fayalite-wustite, and pyroxene-fayalite. The first type is composed of a homogeneous aggregate of augite with the presence of glass, magnesiochromite, copper, and covellite. The second type is represented by fayalite and wustite with the presence of glass, copper, and idaite, as well as cuprite, barite, and atacamite. The third type of slag is composed of hedenbergite and fayalite with the presence of glass, sulfides, as well as silver, gypsum, and secondary copper minerals (cuprite, atacamite, sampleyite, malachite, etc.).

Conclusions. Such a variety of slags in a small excavation area confirms the available information about the various sources of copper ores for the Ekaterinburg plant. At the same time, it can be argued that both oxidized and sulfide copper ores were delivered to the plant. The latter came from the Shilovsky copper mine and were smelted at the Ekaterinburg plant in the first years of its operation. From these ores, slags of the third type were obtained, i.e., of fayalite-hedenbergite composition. Oxidized ores most likely originated from the Gumeshevsky mine (fayalite-wustite slag) and some unknown small mine from the area of the future large Pyshminsko-Klyuchevskoye deposit (pyroxene slag). An interesting technological trend at the Ekaterinburg plant was revealed: here, pyrites were first smelted and only then transition to oxide copper ores was made.

1. Artem’ev D.A., Stepanov I.S., Ankusheva P.S. (2022) Resource and raw material base of the Itkul metallurgy of the early Iron Age of the Middle Trans-Urals. Ural. Istoricheskii Zhurnal, (4), 55-68. (In Russ.)

2. Baidin V.I., Grachev V.Yu., Konovalov Yu.V., Mosin A.G. (2011) Uktus, Uktus plant and its surroundings in the 17–18th centuries. Ekaterinburg, Grachev i Partnery Publ., 68 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bowen N.L., Schairer J.F. (1932) The system FeO–SiO2. Amer. J. Sci., 24, 117-213.

4. Chernoukhov A.V. (1974) Review of the Ekaterinburg Mint Collection. Auxiliary Historical Disciplines. Sverdlovsk, UrGU Publ., 41-50. (In Russ.)

5. Chernykh E.N. (1970) The most ancient metallurgy of the Urals and Volga region. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 180 p. (In Russ.)

6. Danilevskii V.V. (1949) Russian technology. Leningrad, Leningradskoe gazetno-zhurn. i knizhnoe izd-vo Publ., 348 p. (In Russ.)

7. Erokhin Yu.V., Ponomarev V.S., Zakharov A.V., Leonova L.V. (2023) Mineralogy of copper slags of the Sysert ironworks, Middle Urals. Mineralogy, 9(2), 30-40. (In Russ.)

8. Gavrilov D.V. (2000) Ekaterinburg Metallurgical Plant – the Largest Plant in Europe in the 1720s-1740s. 3rd Tatishchev Readings. Abstracts of Reports and Communications. Ekaterinburg, Bank Kul’turnoi Informatsii Publ., 27-33. (In Russ.)

9. Gennin V.I. (2022) Description of the Ural and Siberian plants. Ekaterinburg, Grachev i Partnery Publ., 491 p. (In Russ.)

10. Ivanov S.N. (1941) Gumeshevskoe copper deposit in the Urals. Sov. Geol., (2), 82-96. (In Russ.)

11. Kafengauz B.B. (1949) History of the Demidov household in the 18th–19th centuries. (research experience on the history of Ural metallurgy). Moscow; Leningrad, Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 524 p. (In Russ.)

12. Korepanov N.S. (2001) In early Ekaterinburg. (1723–1781) Ekaterinburg, Bank Kul’turnoi Informatsii Publ., 251 p. (In Russ.)

13. Korepanov N.S. (2012) Uktus – the source of Ekaterinburg. Ekaterinburg, Grachev i Partnery Publ., 40 p. (In Russ.)

14. Kosyakov V.I., Sinyakova E.F. (2014) Melt crystallization of CuFe2S3 in the Cu-Fe-S system. J. Therm. Analys. Calorimetry, 115, 511-516.

15. Melekestseva I.Yu. (2007) Heterogeneous cobalt-copper pyrite deposits in ultramafites of paleoisland-arc structures. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 245 p. (In Russ.)

16. Metallurgical plants of the Urals in the 17–20th centuries. Encyclopedia. (2001) (Сhief ed. V.V. Alekseev). Ekaterinburg, Akademkniga Publ., 536 p. (In Russ.)

17. Murzin V.V., Varlamov D.A., Vikent’ev I.V. (2011) Coppercobalt mineralization of the Pyshminsko-Klyuchevskoye deposit in the Middle Urals: mineral composition of ores and metasomatites, staging, P-T conditions of mineral formation. Lithosphere, (6), 103-122. (In Russ.)

18. Ogorodnikov V.N., Sazonov V.N., Polenov Yu.A. (2001) Geological routes in Yekaterinburg (fundamental issues of geology and minerals). Ekaterinburg, UGGGA Publ., 227 p. (In Russ.)

19. Popova V.I., Popov V.A., Blinov I.A., Ponomarev V.S. (2015) Minerals of the Mednorudyanskoye deposit (Middle Urals). Mineralog. Al’manakh, 20(3), 128 p. (In Russ.)

20. Vertushkov G.N. (1975) Gumeshevskoe malachite deposit in the Urals. Tr. Sverdlovsk. Gornogo Instituta, 106, 3-26. (In Russ.).