Mineralogy and Р-T conditions for the formation of metasomatic rocks of the Voznesenskoye gold deposit (Southern Urals)

Research subject. Mineral associations, their chemical composition, and formation conditions of metasomatic rocks of the Voznesenskoye gold deposit located in the area of the Main Ural Fault in the Southern Urals.

Methods. The chemical composition of minerals was studied using a Tescan Vega Compact scanning electron microscope equipped with an Oxford Instruments Xplorer 15 energy-dispersive analyzer. The formation P-T parameters were estimated using a chlorite geothermometer and a dolomite-calcite geothermobarometer.

Results and conclusions. Two types of metasomatic rocks were identified: 1) propylites, which make up the outer zones of the metasomatic aureole, and 2) beresite-listvenites, common in its inner parts and hosting gold mineralization. The main propylite minerals were amphibole, orthoclase, albite, and ripidolite. Amphibole is represented by two generations, with the early generation comprising magnesian and actinolite hornblende and the late generation comprising actinolite. The crystallization temperature of ripidolite (307–313°С) corresponds to the temperature range of formation of propylites of the albite-actinolite facies. Beresite-listvenites (association: quartz, albite, chlorite, white mica, and carbonate) were formed at a temperature of 255–338°C and a pressure of 0.48–0.72 kbar. Gold ore mineralization was concentrated in the highest temperature zones of the halo of beresite-listvenite alterations. Such temperature conditions existed in dikes and their exocontact zones disturbed by ruptures. Light mica in beresite-listvenites is represented by sericite and phengite, and carbonate is a paragenesis of calcite and dolomite-ankerite. According to the composition and formation period, chlorite is differentiated into early ferruginous ripidolite and late pycnochlorite, depleted in Fe and enriched in Si, which is probably associated with a decrease in temperature during mineral formation and an increase in the activity of sulfide sulfur in the fluid. Along with an increase in the distance from the ore bodies, pycnochlorite exhibits greater contents of Si and lower contents of AlIV. The observed changes in the pycnochlorite composition are related to a decrease in temperature. The research results indicate the formation of the Voznesenskoye deposit under mesothermal conditions.

1. Borodaevskii N.I. (1933) Materials on Au and Cu deposits in Uchaly and Miass areas. Bashkirian RGF, 144 p. (In Russ., unpublished)

2. Féménias O., Mercier Jcc., Nkono C., Diot H., Berza T., Tatu M., Demaiffe D. (2006) Calcic amphibole growth and compositions in calc-alkaline magmas: Evidence from the Motru Dike Swarm (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Amer. Miner., 91, 73-81. https: //doi.org/10.2138/am.2006.1869

3. Hey M.H. (1954) A new review of the chlorites. Miner. Magaz. ine, 1954. 30, 277-292. https: //doi.org/10.1180/MINMAG.1954.030.224.01

4. Kranidiotis P., MacLean W.H. (1987) Systematics of chlorite alteration at the Phelps Dodge massive sulfide deposit, Matagami, Quebec. Econ. Geol., 82, 1898-1911. https: //doi.org/10.2113/GSECONGEO.82.7.1898

5. Latypov F.F. (2014) Final report on the object: “Prospecting for gold deposits within the Kalkanskaya area in order to prepare objects for licensing (Republic of Bashkortostan)” for 2012-2014. Bashkirian RGF, 338 p. (In Russ., unpublished)

6. Leake B.E. (1978). Nomenclature of amphiboles. Amer. Miner., 63, 1023-1052. https: //doi.org/10.1180/MINMAG.1978.042.324.21

7. Marushchenko L.I. (2013) Mineralogy of propilites of the large porphyry copper-molybdenium deposit Peschanka (Western Chukotka). Vestn. Mosc. Univ., Ser. 4. Geol., (2), 22-30. (In Russ.)

8. Marushenko L.I., Baksheev I.A., Nagornaya E.V., Chitalin A.F., Nikolaev Yu.N., Kal’ko I.A., Prokof’ev V.Yu. (2015) Quartz-sericite metasomatites and argillisites Au-Mo-Cu of the Peschanka deposit (Chukotka). Geol. Rudn. Mestorozhd., 57(4), 232-252. (In Russ.) https: //doi.org/10.7868/S001677701503003X

9. Metasomatism and metasomatic rocks, (1998) (Ed. V.A. Zharikov) Moscow, Nauchnyi Mir Publ., 492 p. (In Russ.)

10. Nachit H., Ibhi A., Abia E.H., Ohoud M.B. (2005) Discrimination between primary magmatic biotites, reequilibrated biotites and neoformed biotites. Comptes Rendus Geosci., 337, 1415-1420. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2005.09.002

11. Nagornaya E.V. (2013) Mineralogy and zoning of the molybdenum- copper-porphyry ore field Nakhodka, Chukotka. Diss. cand. geol.-min. nauk. Moscow, 28 p. (In Russ.)

12. Pribavkin S.V. (2019) Amphibole and biotite of melanocratic rocks from the Ural granitic massifs: composition, relationship, petrogenetic consequences. Lithosphere (Russia), 19(6), 902-918. (In Russ.) https: //doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2019-19-6-902-918

13. Ridolfi F., Renzulli A., Puerini M. (2010) Stability and chemical equilibrium of amphibole in calc-alkaline magmas: an overview, new thermobarometric formulations and application to subduction-related volcanoes. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 160(1), 45-66. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00410-009-0465-7

14. Russian gold deposits (2010). Ed. M.M. Konstantinov. Moscow, Aquarelle Publ., 365 p. (In Russ.)

15. Savel’eva G.N. (1987) Gabbro-ultramafic complexes of Ural ophiolites and their analogues in modern oceanic crust. Moscow, GIN AN SSSR, 246 p. (In Russ.)

16. Sazonov V.N., Ogorodnikov V.N., Koroteev V.A., Polenov Yu.A. (2001) Ural gold deposits. Ekaterinburg, USAMG Publ., 622 p. (In Russ.)

17. Seravkin I.B., Kosarev A.M., Salikhov D.N., Znamenskii S.E., Rodicheva Z.I., Rykus M.V., Snachev V.I. (1992) Volcanism of the Southern Urals. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 197 p. (In Russ.)

18. Shabani A.T., Lalonde A.E., Whalen J.B. (2003) Composition of biotite from granitic rocks of the Canadian Appalachian orogen: a potential tectonomagmatic indicator? Canad. Mineral., 41(6), 1381-1396. https: //doi.org/10.2113/GSCANMIN.41.6.1381

19. Scott SD (1984) The use of sphalerite and arsenopyrite to estimate temperatures and sulfur activity in hydrothermal deposits. Physical and chemical models of petrogenesis and ore formation. Novosibirsk, 41-49. (In Russ.)

20. Spiridonov E.M. (1991) Pattern of formation and placement of plutonogenic gold deposits in the northern part of Central Kazakhstan: Diss. dokt. geol-min nauk (in the form of a scientific report) Moscow, 78 p. (In Russ.)

21. Spiridonov E.M. (2010) Review of gold mineralogy in the leading types of Au mineralization. Gold of the Kola Peninsula and adjacent regions. Apatity, KSC RAS, 143-171. (In Russ.)

22. Starostin V.I. (1988) Paleotectonic regimes and mechanisms of formation of structures of ore deposits. Moscow, Nedra Publ, 256 p. (In Russ.)

23. Talantsev A.S. (1981) Geothermobarometry on dolomitecalcite parageneses. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 136 p. (In Russ.)

24. Znamensky S.E. (2009) Structural conditions for the formation of collision gold deposits on the eastern slope of the Southern Urals. Ufa, Gilem Publ, 348 p. (In Russ.)

25. Znamensky S.E., Znamenskaya N.M. (2022) Voznesenskoe gold ore deposit (Southern Urals): Geological structure, ore-bearing rock geochemistry, geodynamic formation conditions. Lithosphere (Russia), 22(3), 391-403. (In Russ.) https: //doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2022-22-3-391-403