Preview

LITHOSPHERE (Russia)

Advanced search

Occurrence of anomalies in soil radon volume activity before tectonic earthquakes

https://doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2021-21-5-724-733

Abstract

Research subject. Earthquakes are a global problem for the entire world population. Therefore, a search for ways to predict and prevent tectonic events is a highly relevant task. Despite the existence of controversial opinions on the possibility of predicting tectonic earthquakes, research in this direction continues. Among numerous possible precursors of earthquakes, anomalies in the volume radon activity (VRA) are the most physically justifed ones. The aim of this research was to compare the observed anomalies of soil radon with the recorded seismic events in order to fnd common patterns. The research area was the Kuril Islands. VRA monitoring was conducted at the South Kuril Geophysical Station of the Institute of Marine Geology and Geophysics of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Methods and materials. Measurements were carried out in the advective mode: soil air from a depth of 70 cm was forcibly delivered to the detector using a pump. For a retrospective analysis, we took registered seismic events with a magnitude greater than 4 that occurred within a radius of 500 km from the monitoring station in Yuzhno-Kurilsk during 2011–2018. Statistical data were processed using Microsoft Excel, Statistica software. Results. A method for comparing radon anomalies and earthquakes was developed. Using the developed methodology, it was found that the geodynamic criterion of ≥2 (the ratio of earthquake magnitude to logarithm of distance from event epicenter to the monitoring station in km) can be used when comparing VRA anomalies with tectonic earthquakes. Out of the 166 considered tectonic earthquakes meeting the geodynamic criterion of ≥2.148, the events were preceded by VRA anomalies. The position of the earthquakes was determined relative to the extremum of previous anomalous radon values in the time interval. Eac  of the considered earthquakes meeting the geodynamic criterion ≥2, which had been preceded by a radon anomaly, occurred either after its extremum or coincided with it in time. Conclusions. The manifestation of tectonic earthquakes in VRA anomalies after passing the extremum can be considered as a short-term prognostic criterion and be used for distinguishing between “near” and “far” events.

About the Authors

I. A. Kozlova
Institute of Geophysics urals Branch of RAS
Russian Federation

 100 Amundsena st., Ekaterinburg 620110 



S. V. Biryulin
Institute of Geophysics urals Branch of RAS
Russian Federation

  100 Amundsena st., Ekaterinburg 620110 



A. K. Yurkov
Institute of Geophysics urals Branch of RAS
Russian Federation

 100 Amundsena st., Ekaterinburg 620110 



References

1. Atkinson B.K. (1980) Stress corrosion and the rate-dependent tensile failure of a fne-grained quartz rock. Tectonophysics, 65(3-4), 281-290.

2. Biryulin S.V., Kozlova I.A., Yurkov A.K. (2019) Investigation of informative value of volume radon activity in soil during both the stress build up and tectonic earthquakes in the south Kuril region. Vestn. KRAuNTs. Nauki o Zemle, 44(4), 73-83. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31431/1816-5524-2019-4-44-73-83

3. Bulashevich Yu.P., Utkin V.I., Yurkov A.K., Nikolaev V.N. (1996) Radon concentration changes and mining impacts in deep mines. Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 345(2), 245-248. (In Russ.)

4. Demezhko D.Yu., Yurkov A.K., Utkin V.I., Shchapov V.A. (2012) Temperature changes in the KUN-1 borehole, Kunashir island, induced by the Tohoku earthquake (march 11, 2011, m = 9.0). Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 445(2), 883-887. (In Russ.)

5. Dobrovol’skii I.P. (1991) Theory of tectonic earthquake preparation. Moscow, OIFZ AN SSSR, 217 p. (In Russ.)

6. Giuliani G.G., Giuliani R., Totani G., Eusani G., Totani F. (2009) Radon observations by gamma detectors PM-4 and PM-2 during the seismic period (January-April 2009) in L’Aquila Basin. AGu Fall Meet. December 14–18, 2009. V. 1. San-Francisco, 3.

7. King C.Y. (1978) Radon emanation on San-Andreas Fault. Nature, 5645, 516-519.

8. King C.Y., Azuma S., Igarashi G., Ohno M., Saito H., Wakita H. (1999) Earthquake-related water-level changes at 16 closely clustered wells in Tono, central Japan. J. Geophys. Res., 104(B6), 13073-13082.

9. King C.Y., King B.S., Evans W.S., Zhang W. (1996) Spatial radon anomalies on active faults in California. Appl. Geochem., 11, 497-510.

10. Kopylova G.N., Boldina S.V. (2019) Hydrogeoseismological research on Kamchatka in 1977–2017 year: history and results. Vulkanol. Seismol., 2, 3-20. (In Russ.) DOI:10.31857/S0203-0306201923-20

11. Kozlova I.A., Yurkov A.K. (2005) The methodic problems of concentration of radon-222 measuring in soil air during monitoring organisation. ural. Geofz. Vestn., 1, 30-34. (In Russ.)

12. Kozlova I.A., Yurkov A.K. (2016) Reflection consecutive seismic events in the feld of radon volume activity. ural. Geofz. Vestn., 1, 35-39. (In Russ.)

13. Lay T., Williams Q., Garnero E.J. (1998) The core-mantle boundary layer and deep Earth dynamics. Nature, 392, 461-468.

14. Lomnitz C. (1994) Fundamentals of earthquake prediction. N. Y., John Wiley & Sons, 326 p.

15. Martinelli G. (1992) Fluidodynamical and chemical features of radon 222 related to total gases: implications on earthquakes prediction topics. IAEA-TECDOC-726 Isotopic and geochemical precursors of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Proc. Advisory Group Meet. held. Vienna, 48-62.

16. Oh Y., Kim G. (2015) A radon-thoron isotope pair as a reliable earthquake precursor. Sci. Rep., 5, 13084. DOI: 10.1038/srep13084

17. Pulinets S.A., Davidenko D.V., Lin’kov A.D., Tarasenko T.E. (2012) The multiparametric analysis problem of predictive seismic monitoring data and ways to solve it. There is no alternative to satellite technologies. Mat-ly Mezhdunar. nauch.-tekhn. konf. “Base problems of radio-electronic engineering”. Moscow, IMGTU MIREA Publ., 57-65. (In Russ.)

18. Rulenko O.P., Kuz’min Yu.D. (2015) Increased radon and thoron in the Verkhne-Paratunka hydrothermal system, southern Kamchatka prior to the catastrophic Japanese earthquake of march 11, 2011. Vulkanol. Seismol., 5, 36-42. (In Russ.)

19. Tikhonov I.N. (2012) Quiescence period prior to strong earthquakes in the Kuril-Kamchatka zone. Tikhookean. Geol., 31(1), 88-95. (In Russ.)

20. Ulomov V.I., Mavashev B.Z. (1967) About precursor of a strong tectonic earthquake. Dokl. AN SSSR, 176(2), 319-323. (In Russ.)

21. Utkin V.I., Yurkov A.K. (2009) Radon as a “deterministic” indicator of natural and industrial geodynamic processes. Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 426(6), 816-820. (In Russ.)

22. Wakita H., Nakamura Y., Notsu K., Noguchi M., Asada T. (1980) Radon anomaly: a possible precursor of the 1978 Izu-Oshimakinkai earthquake. Sci., 207, 882-883.


Review

For citations:


Kozlova I.A., Biryulin S.V., Yurkov A.K. Occurrence of anomalies in soil radon volume activity before tectonic earthquakes. LITHOSPHERE (Russia). 2021;21(5):724-733. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2021-21-5-724-733

Views: 537


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1681-9004 (Print)
ISSN 2500-302X (Online)