Preview

LITHOSPHERE (Russia)

Advanced search

Foraminiferal marker taxa and their correlation potential for definition of the lower Serpukhovian boundary in the Urals

https://doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2020-20-3-328-340

Abstract

Research subject. The choice of the marker and the GSSP (Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point) of the base of the Serpukhovian is currently one of the most urgent tasks of international stratigraphy. The first appearance datum (FAD) of the conodont Lochriea ziegleri in the lineage Lochriea nodosa – Lochriea ziegleri is proposed as a global marker for the lower boundary of the Serpukhovian Stage of the International Stratigraphic Scale. Foraminifers are widely used for the subdivision of the Carboniferous deposits and can serve as auxiliary markers.

Materials and methods. In this paper, the stratigraphic distribution of the foraminiferal marker species Janischewskina delicatа, Neoarchaediscus postrugosus, Eolasiodiscus donbassicus, Monotaxinoides gracilis, Monotaxinoides subplanus is discussed. These species are used to define the lower boundary of the Serpukhovian in the Urals and in the East European Platform.

Results. Data on the first descriptions of their holotypes are summarized. The distributions of these species in the sections of the western slope of the Urals (Kugarchi, Muradymovo, Ladeinaya), the eastern slope of the South Urals (“Verkhnyaya” Kardailovka, Bolshoi Kizil, Khudolaz), the Serpukhovian type sections of the Moscow Syneclise and the boreholes of the southeast of the East European Platform are compared. The published ranges of the marker species in the sections of Western Europe (Spain, France, and northern England), Morocco, Kazakhstan, and China, including the Naqing section are reviewed.

Conclusion. In the shallow-water coral-brachiopod and bioherm facies of the Ural sections, two or three markers can be found simultaneously. In these sections, it is possible to unambiguously determine the lower boundary of the Serpukhovian. However, here, conodonts and ammonoids were not found. Deep-water cephalopod facies containing conodonts are not favorable for foraminifers. In sections where both conodonts and foraminifera are simultaneously encountered, the appearance of foraminiferal marker taxa and conodonts rarely coincide; however, the divergence is small. Regarding the marker taxa under study, their appearance has not been established in sediments older than those dated as the Serpukhovian.

About the Authors

E. I. Kulagina
Institute of Geology of the ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan Federal university
Russian Federation

16/2 Karla Marksa st., ufa 450077 Russia

18 Kremlyovskaya st., Kazan 420008, Russia



E. Yu. Bashlykova
Institute of Geology of the ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
16/2 Karla Marksa st., ufa 450077 Russia


References

1. Wang Q.L., Qi Y.P., Korn D., Chen J.T., Sheng Q.Y., Nemyrovska T.I. (2017) Progress on the Viséan-Serpukhovian boundary in South China and Germany. Newslett. Carbonifer. Stratigr., 33, 35-42. http://carboniferous.stratigraphy.org/

2. Aizenverg D.E., Astakhova T.V., Berchenko O.I., Brazhnikova N.Ye., Vdovenko M.V., Dunaeva N.N., Zernetskaya N.V., Poletayev V.I., Sergeeva M.T. (1983) Verkhneserpukhovskii pod’yarus Donetskogo basseina: Paleontologicheskaya kharakteristika [Upper Serpukhovian Substage in the Donets Basin: Paleontological Characteristics]. Naukova Dumka Publ. Kiev, 273 p. (In Russian)

3. Zhaimina V.Ya., Bivtyshkin V.M., Fazylov E.M., Musina E.S., Shabalina L.V., Prihod’ko D.V. (2017) Upper Devonian-Carboniferous Reef Buildups of the Bolshoi Karatau Mountains (South Kazakhstan). Field Trip Guidebook for the International Field Meeting of the I.u.G.S. Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Almaty-Turkestan. August 15-22, 2017. Almaty, 378. 188 p. (In Russian and English)

4. Akhmetshina L.Z., Gibshman N.B., Kuandykov B.M., Uskova N.A., Kononets V.I., Baimagambetov B.K., Kukhtinov D.A., Degtyareva L.V. (2007). Atlas paleontologicheskikh ostatkov, mikrofatsii i obstanovok osadkonakopleniya famensko-kamennougol’nykh otlozhenii Prikaspiiskoi vpadiny (Kazakhstanskaya chast’) [Atlas of Fossil Remains, Microfacies, and Depositional Environments of the Famennian-Carboniferous Sediments of the Caspian Depression, Kazakhstan Segment]. Almaty, CMYC-OFFSET Publ., 476 p. (In Russian)

5. Alekseev A.S., Kossovaya O.L., Goreva N.V. (2013) State and prospects for improving the General scale of the Russian Carboniferous system. Obshchaya stratigraficheskaya shkala Rossii: Sostoyaniye i perspektivy obustroystva. [General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia: State and prospects of development] All-Russian conference, Moscow, GIN RAS, 165-177.

6. Brazhnikova N.E., Jartzeva M.V. (1956) On the question about the evolution of the genus Monotaxis Voprosy Mikropaleontologii, (1), 62-68. (In Russian)

7. Brenckle, P.L., Collins, J.F., 2017, A chronostratigaphic framework for the Carboniferous Kashagan buildup, PreCaspian Basin, Kazakhstan. Stratigraphy, 14(1–4), 15-34.

8. Brenckle P.L., Milkina N.V. (2003) Foraminiferal timing of carbonate deposition on the late Devonian (Famennian)- Middle Pennsylvanian (Bashkirian) Tengiz Platform, Kazakhstan. Rìvìsta Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 109(2), 131-158.

9. Cózar P., Medina-Varea P., Somerville I.D., Vachard D., Rodríguez S., Said I. (2014) Foraminifers and conodonts from the late Viséan to early Bashkirian succession in the Saharan Tindouf Basin (southern Morocco): biostratigraphic refinements and implications for correlations in the western Palaeotethys. Geol. J., 49, 271-302. DOI: 10.1002/gj.2519

10. Cozar P., Said I., Somerville I.D., Vachard D., Medina-Varea P., Rodríguez S., Berkhli M. (2011) Potential foraminiferal markers for the Viséan-Serpukhovian and Serpukhovian-Bashkirian boundaries – a case-study from Central Morocco. J. Paleontol., 85(6), 1105-1127.

11. Cózar P., Sanz-López J., Blanco-Ferrera S. (2015) Late Viséan-Serpukhovian lasiodiscid foraminifers in Vegas de Sotres section (Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain): Potential biostratigraphic markers for the Viséan- Serpukhovian boundary. Geobios, 48, 213-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2015.02.006

12. Cozar P., Somerville I.D. (2014) Latest Viséan-Early Namurian (Carboniferous) foraminifers from Britain: implications for biostratigraphic and glacioeustatic correlations // Newslett. Stratigr., 47, 355-367. DOI: 10.1127/nos/2014/0052

13. Cózar P., Somerville I.D. (2016) Problems correlating the late Brigantian-Arnsbergian Western European substages within northern England. Geol. J., 51, 817-840. DOI: 10.1002/gj.2700

14. Cozar P., Somerville I.D., Burgess I. (2010) Foraminiferal, calcareous algal and problematica assemblages from the Mississippian Lower Limestone Formation in the Midland Valley, Scotland. Earth. Environment. Sci. Transact. Royal Soc. Edinburgh, 100, 297-309.

15. Cozar P., Somerville I.D., Sanz-Lopé, J., Blanco-Ferrera S. (2016) Foraminiferal biostratigraphy across the Viséan/Serpukhovian boundary in the Vegas de Sotres section (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain). J. Foraminiferal Res., 46(2), 171-192.

16. Garan’ I.M., Postoyalko M.V. (1975) On Low Carboniferous stratigraphy of the Middle Urals. Kamennougol’nyye otlozheniya na urale. Sbornik po voprosam stratigrafii. [Carboniftrous deposits on the Urals. Collection on stratigraphy problems] V. 25. Sverdlovsk: UNTs AN SSSR. 47-67. (In Russian)

17. Gibshman N.B. (2001) Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Serpukhovian Stage Stratotype (Zabor’e Quarry, Moscow Basin). Newslett. Carbonifer. Stratigr., 19, 31-34.

18. Gibshman, N.B. (2003) Foraminifers from the Serpukhovian Stage Stratotype, the Zabor’e Quarry (Moscow Region). Stratig. Geol. Correl., 11(1), 36-60.

19. Gibshman N.B., Baranova D.V. (2007) The foraminifers Janischewskina and “Millerella,” and their evolutionary patterns and biostratigraphic potential for the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary. Proceedings of 15th International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian, Royal Netherlands Academy Arts and Sciences: Amsterdam, 269-281.

20. Gibshman N.B., Kabanov P.B., Alekseev A.S., Goreva N.V., Moshkina M.A. (2009) Novogurovsky Quarry – Upper Viséan and Serpukhovian. Type and reference Carboniferous sections in the south part of the Moscow Basin. Field Trip Guidebook of International Field Meeting of the I. U. G. S. Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Moscow, PIN RAN, 13-44.

21. Gibshman N.B., Vevel Ya.A., Zaytseva E.L., Stepanova T.I. (2018) Foraminifera of the genus Janischewskina Mikhailov, 1935 emend. Mikhailov, 1939: morphology, areal and biostratigraphy of Visean and Serpukhovian stages. Trudy XVII Vseros. Mikropaleontol. Konf. “Sovremennaya mikropaleontologiya – problem i perspeknivy” [Proc. of XVII All-Russian Micropaleontological Meeting “Modern Micropaleontology – Problems and Prospects”]. Moscow, PIN RAN, 28-33. (In Russian) www.ginras.ru/materials/files/kazan2018_trudy.pdf

22. Gorozhanina E.N., Dnistryanskii V.I., Poberezhskii S.M., Gorozhanin V.M., Pazukhin V.N., Kulagina E.I., Kochetova N.N., Remizova S.T., Chibrikova E.V. (2007) The reference section of the Paleozoic deposits of the northern Cis-Caspian based on the drilling log of Borehole 20 of the Peschanaya Field. Geologiya, razrabotka i obustroistvo neftyanykh i gazovykh mestorozhdeniy Orenburgskoi oblasti. Nauchnye Trudy OAO IPK “Yuzhnyi ural” [Geology, exploration and arrange of Orenburg area petrole deposits. Proc. IPK “The, Southern Urals”, (4), 73-86. (In Russian)

23. Groves J.R., Wang Y., Qi Y.P., Richards B.C., Ueno K., Wang X.D. (2012) Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Viséan–Serpukhovian (Mississippian) boundary interval at slope and platform sections in southern Guizhou (South China). J. Paleontol., 860, 753-774.

24. Kabanov P.B., Alekseev A.S., Gibshman N.B., Gabdullin R.R., Bershov A.V. (2016) The upper Viséan-Serpukhovian in the type area for the Serpukhovian Stage (Moscow Basin, Russia): Pt 1. Sequences, disconformities, and biostratigraphic summary. Geol. J., 51, 163-194. DOI: 10.1002/gj.2612

25. Kulagina E.I. (2017) Evolution of Asteroarchaediscidae A. Miklukho-Maclay, 1957 in the Carboniferous. Paleontol. J. 51(7), 18-28. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030117070061

26. Kulagina E.I., Gibshman N.B. (2002) Zonal subdivision of the Serpukhovian Stage based on foraminifers. stratigrafiya i paleogeografiya karbona Evrazii [Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of Eurasia]. IGG UrO RAN, Yekaterinburg, 183-192. (In Russian)

27. Kulagina E.I., Gibshman N.B. (2005) General foraminiferal zonation of the Lower Carboniferous in Russia. Bull. MOIP, Otd. geol. 80(2), 35-59. (In Russian)

28. Kulagina E.I., Gibshman N.B., Nikolaeva S.V. (2008) Foraminifer-based correlation of the Chesterian Stage in the Mississippian type region, Illinois, USA, to the Serpukhovian of Russia. Newslett. Carbonifer. Stratigr., 26, 14-18.

29. Kulagina E., Nikolaeva S., Pazukhin V., Kochetova N. (2014) Biostratigraphy and lithostratigraphy of the MidCarboniferous boundary beds in the Muradymovo section (South Urals, Russia). Geol. Magaz., 151(2), 269-298. DOI: 10.1017/S0016756813000599

30. Kullmann J., Nikolaeva S.V. (2003) ФA global review of the Serpukhovian biostratigraphy. Newslett. Stratigr. 39(2/3), 101-132.

31. Malakhova. N.P. (1956) Foraminifers of the Shartymka River limestones in the Southern Urals Sbornik po voprosam stratigrafii 3. [Collection on Stratigraphy No 3]. Sverdlovsk: Trudy GGI UF AN SSSR V. 24, 26-71. (In Russian)

32. Mizens G.A., Stepanova T.I., Kucheva N.A. (2012) Eastern zones of Middle Urals in Carboniferous (evolution of depositional basins and paleotectonic features). Litosfera. (4), 107-126. (In Russian)

33. Nikolaeva S.V., Alekseev A.S., Kulagina E.I., Gatovsky Yu.A., Ponomareva G.Yu., Gibshman N.B. (2019) An evaluation of biostratigraphic markers across multiple geological sections in the search for the GSSP of the base of the Serpukhovian Stage (Mississippian). Palaeoworld, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2019.01.006

34. Nikolaeva S.V., Kulagina E.I., Gorozhanina E.N., Alekseev A.S., Konovalova V.A. (2017) Conodonts, ammonoids, foraminifers, and depositional settings of the Serpukhovian and Bashkirian in the Kugarchi Section in the South Urals. Stratigraphy, 14(1-4), 319-347. DOI:10.29041/strat.14.1-4.319-347

35. Pazukhin V.N., Kulagina E.I., Kochetova N.N., Nikolaeva S.V., Konovalova V.A. (2010) The Serpukhovian Stage in the Verkhnyaya Kardailovka Section, South Urals. Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 18(3), 269-289.

36. Plyusnina A.A., Ivanova R.M. (1983) Serpukhovian Stage of the eastern slope of the Middle and Southern Urals. Bull. MOIP, Otd. geol., 58(4), 72-80. (In Russian)

37. Plyusnina A.A., Ivanova R.M., Devingtal’ V.V. (1979) Serpukhovian Key Sections on the eastern slope of the Middle Urals]. Opornyye razrezy karbona urala. Sbornik po voprosam stratigrafii № 26. [Key Sections of Urals Carboniferous. Collection on Stratigraphy No 26.] Sverdlovsk: UNTS AN SSSR, 85-94. (In Russian)

38. Ponomareva G.Yu. (2010). Paleontological substantiation of the boundaries of the Visean and Serpukhovian horizons in a typical section “Ladeynyi Log”. Geologiya i neftegazonosnost’ severnykh rayonov uralo-Povolzh’ya: Materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. Konf., posvyashch. 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya prof. P.A. Sofronitskogo. [Geology and petroleum potentialof the Ural-Volga region northern area. Proc. All-Russian sci.-pract. Conf. to 100-th anniversary of prof P.A. Sofronitsky birth]. Perm: Perm State University, 74-93. (In Russian)

39. Ponomareva G.Yu., Alekseev A.S., Kossovaya O.L., Isakova T.N. (2015) Mariinsky Log Section. Serpukhovian, Bashkirian, Lower Moscovian. G.Yu. Ponomareva, O.L. Kossovaya, I.S. Khopta (Eds.), Middle Urals, Carboniferous and Permian Marine and Continental Successions. Field Trip Guidebook of XVIII International Congress of the Carboniferous and Permian, Kazan 2015. Perm: Printing House Aster, 66-91.

40. Postanovleniya Mezhvedomstvennogo stratigraficheskogo komiteta i yego postoyannykh komissiy (2003) A.I. Zhamoyda (red.) [Decisions of the Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Committee and its standing committees] SPb.: VSEGEI, (34), 48p. (In Russian)

41. Reitlinger E.A. (1949) Melkie foraminifery nizhnej chasti srednego karbona Srednego Urala i Prikamja [Smaller foraminifers in the lower part of the Middle Carboniferous in the Central Urals and Prikamye] Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Ser. geol., (6), 149-164. (In Russian)

42. Reitlinger E.A. (1956) Novoe semejstvo Lasiodiscidae [Lasiodiscidae, a new family]. Voprosy mikropaleontologii, (1), 69-78. (In Russian)

43. Richards B.C., Nikolaeva S.V., Kulagina E.I., Alekseev A.S., Gorozhanina E.N., Gorozhanin V.M., Konovalova V.A., Goreva N.V., Joachimski M.M., Gatovsky Y.A. (2017) A candidate for the Global Stratotype Section and Point at the base of the Serpukhovian in the South Urals, Russia. Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 25(7), 697-758. DOI: 10.1134/S0869593817070036

44. Shcherbakov O.A., Devingtal’ V.V. (1980) Scheme of the Carboniferous stratigraphy of the Urals. Part I. Ob”yasnitel’naya zapiska k unifitsirovannym i korrelyatsionnym stratigraficheskim skhemam Urala [Explanatory note to the unified and correlation stratigraphic schemes of the Urals], Sverdlovsk, UNTS AN SSSR, 116-152. (In Russian)

45. Shcherbakov O.A., Postoyalko M.V., Shcherbakova M.V., Chuvashov B.I., Kucheva N.A., Stepanova T.I. (1994) Stratigraphic Scheme of the Carboniferos of the Urals. Explanatory Note to Ural Stratigraphic Schemes (Precambrian, Paleozoic) Skhema stratigrafii kamennougol’nykh otlozheniy Urala. Materialy i resheniya Chetvertogo ural’skogo mezhvedomstvennogo stratigraficheskogo soveshchaniya [Materials and Solutions of the Fourth Ural Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Meeting] (Sverdlovsk, 1990). Ekaterinburg, Ural’skaya geologos”yemochnaya ekspeditsiya, 97-127. (In Russian)

46. Shcherbakov O.A., Postoyalko M.V., Shcherbakova M.V., Chuvashov B.I., Cherepanova N.A., Lyadova R.A., Pazukhin V.N., Grabezheva T.G., Stepanova T.I. (1990) Problematic issues of Ural Carboniferous stratigraphy. Problemnye voprosy stratigrafii karbona urala. Kamennougol’naya i permskaya sistemy. [Problems of the Ural stratigraphy. Carboniferous and Permian systems], Sverdlovsk, UrO AN SSSR, 1-29. (In Russian)

47. Sheng Q., Wang X., Brenckle P., Huber B.T. (2018) Serpukhovian (Mississippian) foraminiferal zones from the Fenghuangshan section, Anhui Province, South China: implications for biostratigraphic correlations. Geol. J., 53(1), 45-57. DOI: 10.1002/gj.2877

48. Stepanova T.I., Kucheva N.A. (2006) The “Khudolaz” Section as a stratotype of horizons of a Subregion Scheme of the Lower Carboniferous deposits of the Urals Eastern Slope. Litosfera, (1), 45-75.

49. Stepanova T.I., Kucheva N.A. (2009) Paleontological substantiation of the Serpukhovian horizons of the Eastern Uralian subregion in the stratotype section on the Khudolaz River. Tipovye razrezy karbona Rossii i potentsial’nye global’nye stratotipy. Yuzhnoural’skaya sessiya: Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo polevogo soveshchaniya “The Historical Type Sections, Proposed and Potential GSSPs of the Carboniferous in Russia” Ufa DesignPolygraphService Publ. 97-128.

50. Stratigraficheskie schemy urala (dokembrii, paleozoi) (1993) [Stratigrafic Schemes of the Urals (Precambrian, Paleozoic). Ekaterinburg. IGG UrO RAN, 151 p. (In Russian)

51. Stratigrafiya i fauna kamennougol’nykh otlozheniy reki Shartym (Yuzhnyy ural) [Stratigraphy and fauna of the Carboniferous deposits of the Shartym River (South Ural)] (Ed.) E.L. Eynor. (1973) L’vov, Vishcha shkola, 184 p. (In Russian)

52. unifitsirovannyye i korrelyatsionnyye stratigraficheskiye skhemy urala [Unified and correlation stratigraphic schemes of the Urals]. (1980) Sverdlovsk, UNTS AN SSSR. (In Russian)

53. Vachard D., Cózar P., Aretz M., Izart A. (2016) Late Visé-an-Serpukhovian foraminifers in the Montagne Noire (France): biostratigraphic revision and correlation with the Russian substages.Geobios, 49(6), 469-498. DOI:10.1016/j.geobios.2016.09.002

54. Wang X. (2017) Annual report to ICS for 2016-2017. Newslett. Carbonifer. Stratigr., 33, 7-9. http://carboniferous.stratigraphy.org/

55. Wang Q.L., Qi Y.P., Korn D., Chen J.T., Sheng Q.Y., Nemyrovska T.I. (2017) Progress on the Viséan-Serpukhovian boundary in South China and Germany. Newslett. Carbonifer. Stratigr., 33, 35-42. http://carboniferous.stratigraphy.org/

56. Zhaimina V.Ya., Bivtyshkin V.M., Fazylov E.M., Musina E.S., Shabalina L.V., Prihod’ko D.V. (2017) Upper Devonian-Carboniferous Reef Buildups of the Bolshoi Karatau Mountains (South Kazakhstan). Field Trip Guidebook for the International Field Meeting of the I.u.G.S. Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy. Almaty-Turkestan. August 15-22, 2017. Almaty, 378. 188 p. (In Russian and English)


Review

For citations:


Kulagina E.I., Bashlykova E.Yu. Foraminiferal marker taxa and their correlation potential for definition of the lower Serpukhovian boundary in the Urals. LITHOSPHERE (Russia). 2020;20(3):328-340. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2020-20-3-328-340

Views: 567


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1681-9004 (Print)
ISSN 2500-302X (Online)